Failure to select a new CEO to lead Milwaukee-based motorcycle manufacturer Harley-Davidson contributed to Jared Dourdeville’s recent decision to resign from the company’s board, according to a new SEC filing from the company. Dourdeville submitted his resignation earlier this month, listing several of his concerns about how the company is being run and the future
Already a subscriber? Log in
To continue reading this article ...
Subscribe to BizTimes today and get immediate access to our Insider-only content and much more.Learn More and Subscribe Now
Jared Dourdeville[/caption]
As part of the search process, Harley’s board considered three final candidates for the role of CEO. None of the candidates received majority support from the board, according to the recent SEC filing from Harley-Davidson.
There was a 4 to 4 split vote on March 28 for the candidate that Dourdeville supported.
Harley claims Dourdeville wrote the company “immediately after his candidate wasn’t selected” and began “abruptly attacking his fellow directors.”
"During his tenure as a director, Mr. Dourdeville was aligned with the strategy developed by management and approved by the board and fully supported its implementation by management,” said the company in Tuesday’s filing. “In fact, in recent letters that he sent to the company, Mr. Dourdeville highlighted the value of the company’s 'iconic' brand and made clear that the 'centerpiece' of the company’s five-year strategic plan, the Hardwire was 'a central element of (H Partners’) investment thesis' that he himself 'fully supported.'”
Dourdeville fired back at Harley-Davidson in yet another letter (dated April 11), stating the company has mischaracterized the events and boardroom dynamics that led to his resignation.
He explained that in February of 2025, Harley’s board was setting dates for a final round of CEO candidate interviews. Dourdeville said he had assumed the board would indeed select a new CEO, so he did not object to the company’s slate of directors as they were presented for election at the board's February meeting. Dourdeville voted in favor of of re-electing all of the company’s directors. Later, in his letter of resignation, Dourdeville recommended that board members Tom Linebarger and Sara Levinson resign.
Representatives from Harley-Davidson say Dourdeville never vocalized any of the issues he raised in his letter of resignation while serving as a member of the board. But Dourdeville argues that several of the cultural issues he cited in his resignation letter were never brought to the board as matters to vote on.
“The suggestion that I did not voice any concerns during my time on the board is false, and furthermore, it clearly ignores my efforts to work constructively and collaboratively within the board setting on times such as product development plans, dealer profitability, dealer inventory, remote-work policies, company culture and other topics,” wrote Dourdeville.
Further, Dourdeville claims he voiced his concerns about Harley’s remote work policies in several executive session meetings of the board.
“Debate around this issue was unilaterally squelched with the response, ‘That’s a non-starter for our CEO,’” wrote Dourdeville.
He reemphasized his belief that there are “many issues plaguing the company that require urgent attention.”
